linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for August 25 (mm/slub)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 25 Aug 2010 12:21:34 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for August 25 (mm/slub)

On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:11:25 -0500 (CDT) Christoph Lameter wrote:

> On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> 
> > and in different builds:
> >
> > mm/slub.c:1898: note: expected 'struct kmem_cache *' but argument is of type 'struct kmem_cache **'
> > mm/slub.c:1756: note: expected 'struct kmem_cache *' but argument is of type 'struct kmem_cache **'
> 
> Hmmm... Any details on the configuration that got you this result?

Certainly.  config file is attached.

Excerpt:
CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG=y
# CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK is not set
# CONFIG_SLAB is not set
CONFIG_SLUB=y

---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

Download attachment "config-r5816" of type "application/octet-stream" (39123 bytes)