linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fix initramfs size calculation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1282812947.1879.17.camel@holzheu-laptop>
Date:	Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:55:47 +0200
From:	Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:	Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	tabbott@...lice.com, vda.linux@...glemail.com, mmarek@...e.cz,
	hpa@...ux.intel.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
	schwidefsky@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix initramfs size calculation

Hello Sam,

On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 21:56 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 09:15:32PM +0200, Hendrik Brueckner wrote:
> > Sam,
> > 
> > I have work together with Michael on this patch... see my comments below
> > 
> > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 08:06:01PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 05:57:12PM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:
> > > 
> > > Another way to fix this could be to align . to an even
> > > address like this:
> > > > #define INIT_RAM_FS                                                     \
> > > >         . = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE);                                           \
> > > >         VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__initramfs_start) = .;                          \
> > > >         *(.init.ramfs)                                                  \
> > >           . = ALIGN(32);                                                  \
> > > >         VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__initramfs_end) = .;
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 32 was selected as this is what we will introduce as the default
> > > alignment in linker scripts anyway.
> > >
> > > This I guess is a problem we have had some time and a minimal fix is
> > > easier to have backported by the stable team.
> > 
> > The first thought was similar but using ALIGN(2).  However, the current
> > implementation of populate_rootfs() passes the calculated size to the
> > decompress functions.  If __initramfs_end is aligned, the resulting size
> > might be greater than the real size of the initramfs.
> > So I guess this might also cause problems.
> Another variant could be to explicit add alignment in the .S files
> so the section is always aligned to a even byte boundary (or maybe 32 byte boundary).

Then still the unpack_to_rootfs() function will not get the correct size
of the compressed file, because "__initramfs_end - __initramfs_start"
can be bigger than the real file size depending on the used the
alignment. I would assume that not all decompression functions will
work, if a bigger value is passed to decompress_method().

Michael




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/