[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1008261140390.14167@axis700.grange>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 11:45:58 +0200 (CEST)
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
cc: mitov@...p.bas.bg, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, philippe.retornaz@...l.ch,
gregkh@...e.de, jkrzyszt@....icnet.pl
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] add dma_reserve_coherent_memory()/dma_free_reserved_memory()
API
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> Why can't you revert a commit that causes the regression?
See this reply, and the complete thread too.
http://marc.info/?l=linux-sh&m=128130485208262&w=2
> The related DMA API wasn't changed in 2.6.36-rc1. The DMA API is not
> responsible for the regression. And the patchset even exnteds the
> definition of the DMA API (dma_declare_coherent_memory). Such change
> shouldn't applied after rc1. I think that DMA-API.txt says that
> dma_declare_coherent_memory() handles coherent memory for a particular
> device. It's not for the API that reserves coherent memory that can be
> used for any device for a single device.
Anyway, we need a way to fix the regression.
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists