[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100826100355.05fcfd87.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:03:55 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2][BUGFIX] oom: remove totalpage normalization from
oom_badness()
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 17:52:06 -0700 (PDT)
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>
> > I'm now trying to write a userspace tool to calculate this, for me.
> > Then, could you update documentation ?
> > ==
> > 3.2 /proc/<pid>/oom_score - Display current oom-killer score
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > This file can be used to check the current score used by the oom-killer is for
> > any given <pid>. Use it together with /proc/<pid>/oom_adj to tune which
> > process should be killed in an out-of-memory situation.
> > ==
> >
>
> You'll want to look at section 3.1 of Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt,
> which describes /proc/pid/oom_score_adj, not 3.2.
>
> > add a some documentation like:
> > ==
> > (For system monitoring tool developpers, not for usual users.)
> > oom_score calculation is implemnentation dependent and can be modified without
> > any caution. But current logic is
> >
> > oom_score = ((proc's rss + proc's swap) / (available ram + swap)) + oom_score_adj
> >
>
> I'd hesitate to state the formula outside of the implementation and
> instead focus on the semantics of oom_score_adj (as a proportion of
> available memory compared to other tasks), which I tried doing in section
> 3.1. Then, the userspace tool only need be concerned about the units of
> oom_score_adj rather than whether rss, swap, or later extentions such as
> shm are added.
>
> Thanks for working on this, Kame!
>
BTW, why you don't subtract the amount of Hugepages ?
The old code did
"totalrampages - hugepage" as available memory.
IIUC, the number of hugepages is not accounted into mm->rss, so, isn't it
better to subtract # of hugepage ?
Hmm...makes no difference ?
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists