linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] gpio: Add generic driver for simple memory mapped controllers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100826174822.75094415@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:48:22 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc:	Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: Add generic driver for simple memory mapped
 controllers

> Just rename it to match the IP block used.

There are zillions of IP blocks that have that interface, how exactly do
you propose to rename it.

> That removes all confusion.  Engineers will
>  be able to know more easily whether this
> driver is even relevant to them.

Not unless its got a name about 1000 characters long listing all the
devices it might drive - and changes name weekly.
 
> An example might be "amba-9999 (a made-up
> number, likely not matching a GPIO controller).

What's wrong with a sensible generic name like gpio-mmio-table ?

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/