[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C76AD82.2030105@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 11:08:02 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>
CC: hmh@....eng.br, mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, lenb@...nel.org,
tony.luck@...il.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC - V2] - Mapping ACPI tables as CACHED
On 08/26/2010 10:17 AM, Jack Steiner wrote:
> Map ACPI tables as WB on x86_64. No substantive changes to IA64.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>
>
> ---
> V2 - Change the patch to unconditionally map ACPI tables as WB on x86_64.
> I'm still some paranoid about this because of the potential imapct on
> some platforms with weird BIOSs. However, note that on EFI-enabled
> systems (like UV), the ACPI tables are already mapped as WB memory.
> This is done in the EFI function efi_enter_virtual_mode().
> The ACPI code in acpi_os_map_memory() is not currently aware of the
> EFI mapping & currently maps the memory as UC. This seems like a bug.
>
I really think that it's all a consequence of the fact that ioremap()
became implicitly UC when we added PAT support (being the more
conservative choice.)
Len, want to take this one or should I?
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists