[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C76AF8D.2030507@cs.helsinki.fi>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:16:45 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
CC: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (slab
tree related)
On 26.8.2010 17.41, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, David Rientjes wrote:
>
>> I'm really hoping that we can remove this hack soon when the percpu
>> allocator can handle these allocations on UP without any specialized slab
>> behavior.
>
> So do I. Here is a slightly less hacky version through using
> kmalloc_large instead:
Applied and queued to -next.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists