linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for August 25 (mm/slub)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C76AFAE.7010907@cs.helsinki.fi>
Date:	Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:17:18 +0300
From:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
CC:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for August 25 (mm/slub)

On 25.8.2010 23.30, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 08/25/10 12:07, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>
>>> mm/slub.c:1732: error: implicit declaration of function 'slab_pre_alloc_hook'
>>> mm/slub.c:1751: error: implicit declaration of function 'slab_post_alloc_hook'
>>> mm/slub.c:1881: error: implicit declaration of function 'slab_free_hook'
>>> mm/slub.c:1886: error: implicit declaration of function 'slab_free_hook_irq'
>>
>> Empty functions are missing if the runtime debuggability option is
>> compiled
>> out.
>>
>>
>> Subject: slub: Add dummy functions for the !SLUB_DEBUG case
>>
>> Provide the fall back functions to empty hooks if SLUB_DEBUG is not set.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter<cl@...ux.com>
>
> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap<randy.dunlap@...cle.com>

Applied, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/