linux-kernel - Re: [patch 1/5] mm: add nofail variants of kmalloc kcalloc and kzalloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008261528160.5445@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date:	Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:31:22 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
	Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
	Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	"linux-raid@...r.kernel.org" <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	"cluster-devel@...hat.com" <cluster-devel@...hat.com>,
	"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	"reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org" <reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/5] mm: add nofail variants of kmalloc kcalloc and
 kzalloc

On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, Christoph Lameter wrote:

> > Because we can remove the flag, remove branches from the page allocator
> > slowpath, and none of these allocations actually are dependent on
> > __GFP_NOFAIL since they are all under PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER.
> 
> Then we can simply remove __GFP_NOFAIL? Functions are only needed for
> higher order allocs that can fail?
> 

Yes, that's the intent.  We'd like to add the 
WARN_ON_ONCE(get_order(size) >= PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) warning, though, 
so we're ensured that redefinition of that #define doesn't cause 
allocations to fail to that don't have appropriate error handling or 
future callers use higher order allocs.  The _nofail() functions help that 
and do some due diligence in ensuring that we aren't changing gfp flags 
based only on the current page allocator implementation which may later 
change with very specialized corner cases.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/