[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100826130200.F66A.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:02:29 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
bhutchings@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: select(writefds) don't hang up when a peer close connection
> From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:09:55 +0900
>
> > Probably my example is not so good. That's not my point.
> > In the example application, client and server socket is in the same process.
> > But it's NOT generic. usually, client and server are another process. then,
> > client can't expect when server close socket.
> >
> > The most big matter is, this is can't be avoided in userland. In addition,
> > EVERY application don't want application hang up. we don't hesitate
> > userland change.
>
> Ok, you and Ben Hutchings have convinced me to reconsider.
>
> And this matches what even BSD4.4-Lite does (I checked yesterday before
> my initial reply), so I will apply this patch.
>
> Thanks for your patience.
Great!
Thank you!!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists