[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1282914224.3025.28.camel@odin>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:03:44 +0100
From: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
To: Gary King <GKing@...dia.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <mike@...pulab.co.il>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: tps6586x-regulator - fix bit_mask
parameter for tps6586x_set_bits()
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 14:25 -0700, Gary King wrote:
> The patch seems fine.
>
> - Gary
> ________________________________________
> From: Liam Girdwood [lrg@...mlogic.co.uk]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 2:53 AM
> To: Mike Rapoport
> Cc: Mark Brown; Gary King; Axel Lin; linux-kernel
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: tps6586x-regulator - fix bit_mask parameter for tps6586x_set_bits()
>
> On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 13:09 +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 10:42:42PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> > >> The third parameter of tps6586x_set_bits() is the bit_mask,
> > >> thus we should use (1 << ri->go_bit) instead of ri->go_bit.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> > >
> > > but I'd be much happier if someone who actually has the hardware could
> > > verify that this is OK.
> >
> > I don't have the hardware handy at the moment.
> > Gary, can you please verify the fix?
> >
>
> Do we have any news on this testing ? I'd like to have these upstream
> for rc3.
>
Applied.
Thanks
Liam
--
Freelance Developer, SlimLogic Ltd
ASoC and Voltage Regulator Maintainer.
http://www.slimlogic.co.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists