[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100827011436.GB3521@parisc-linux.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:14:36 -0600
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To: Valerie Aurora <vaurora@...hat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VFS: Sanity check mount flags passed to
change_mnt_propagation()
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 04:03:18PM -0400, Valerie Aurora wrote:
> + /* Fail if any non-propagation flags are set */
> + if (type & ~(MS_SHARED | MS_PRIVATE | MS_SLAVE | MS_UNBINDABLE))
> + return 0;
> + /* Only one propagation flag should be set */
> + if (((type & (MS_SHARED)) && (type & ~MS_SHARED)) ||
> + ((type & (MS_PRIVATE)) && (type & ~MS_PRIVATE)) ||
> + ((type & (MS_SLAVE)) && (type & ~MS_SLAVE)) ||
> + ((type & (MS_UNBINDABLE)) && (type & ~MS_UNBINDABLE)))
> + return 0;
Hrm. I think we can do this a bit more pithily.
/* Only one propagation flag should be set, and no others */
if (hweight32(type) != 1 &&
(type & ~(MS_SHARED | MS_PRIVATE | MS_SLAVE | MS_UNBINDABLE))
return 0;
Too clever?
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists