linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv11 2.6.36-rc2-tip 10/15] 10: tracing: config option to enable both kprobe-tracer and uprobe-tracer.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 28 Aug 2010 00:37:52 +0900
From:	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To:	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Mark Wielaard <mjw@...hat.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Naren A Devaiah <naren.devaiah@...ibm.com>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	2nddept-manager@....hitachi.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCHv11 2.6.36-rc2-tip 10/15] 10: tracing: config option to
 enable both kprobe-tracer and uprobe-tracer.

(2010/08/27 21:17), Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
>>>
>>> I think we should go with the first one, i.e have a common knob thats
>>> by default unselected.
>>
>> Yeah, I'm OK to have a common knob, but I just don't like to set
>> KPROBE_EVENT unselected by default. I think there is no reason
>> to change default selecting (currently, KPROBE_EVENT=y by default.)
> 
> I understand your concern.
> 
>>
>> So, I think we should have below selecting list;
>> --- Tracers
>> ...
>> [*] Enable dynamic events
>>    [ ] Enable user-space dynamic events (EXPERIMENTAL)
>> ...
>>
>> What would you think about this ? :)
>>
>> Thank you,
> 
> 
> Wouldnt it negate the purpose of common knob?
> Because people would still have go and select UPROBE_EVENTS,

Hmm, I think this just seems an enhancement of dynamic events,
and also you can enable it by default on some point.
I mean, eventually, there will be only "Enable dynamic events"
on the screen.

> I think when Frederic asked for a common knob, he was looking at
> enabling both or disabling both and an option to selectively
> select one of the tracers. 

Yeah, but I'd like to ask Frederic that he expected disabling
KPROBE_EVENT by default too, even though it changes current
default config.

Thank you,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/