[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimLhZcP=eqB9TFfO_rgb-dhXUJh8iNTXuceuCq0@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 10:41:48 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Do not wait the full timeout on congestion_wait
when there is no congestion
Hi, Wu.
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com> wrote:
> Minchan,
>
> It's much cleaner to keep the unchanged congestion_wait() and add a
> congestion_wait_check() for converting problematic wait sites. The
> too_many_isolated() wait is merely a protective mechanism, I won't
> bother to improve it at the cost of more code.
You means following as?
while (unlikely(too_many_isolated(zone, file, sc))) {
congestion_wait_check(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
/* We are about to die and free our memory. Return now. */
if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
return SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX;
}
>
> Thanks,
> Fengguang
>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists