linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 03/43] ptrace: change signature of arch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87occof2mw.fsf@NHK-XNOTE.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Date:	Sat, 28 Aug 2010 01:20:55 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/43] ptrace: change signature of arch_ptrace()

Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> writes:
> Would it be possible to rearrange your patches so that you don't break
> anything in the middle? I think merging all the trivial 'change signature'
> patches into one would also make reviewing easier. Nobody in their
> right mind is looking through a full series of 43 patches, especially
> if they do not make sense on their own, but one patch that changes a
> function signature tree-wide would be looked at by many people and can
> be applied standalone.
>

OK. Will combine those.
BTW, one thing I wonder is it will have huge CC list of arch maintainers
in commit message, so is it usual? or is there other way?


-- 
Regards,
Namhyung Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/