linux-kernel - Re: [KVM timekeeping 13/35] Perform hardware_enable in CPU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:32:30 +0200
From:	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
To:	Zachary Amsden <zamsden@...hat.com>
CC:	kvm@...r.kernel.org, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [KVM timekeeping 13/35] Perform hardware_enable in CPU_STARTING
 callback

Zachary Amsden wrote:
> The CPU_STARTING callback was added upstream with the intention
> of being used for KVM, specifically for the hardware enablement
> that must be done before we can run in hardware virt.  It had
> bugs on the x86_64 architecture at the time, where it was called
> after CPU_ONLINE.  The arches have since merged and the bug is
> gone.

What bugs are you referring to, or since which kernel version is
CPU_STARTING usable for KVM? I need to encode this into kvm-kmod.

Thanks,
Jan

> 
> It might be noted other features should probably start making
> use of this callback; microcode updates in particular which
> might be fixing important erratums would be best applied before
> beginning to run user tasks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zachary Amsden <zamsden@...hat.com>
> ---
>  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c |    5 ++---
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index b78b794..d4853a5 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -1958,10 +1958,10 @@ static int kvm_cpu_hotplug(struct notifier_block *notifier, unsigned long val,
>  		       cpu);
>  		hardware_disable(NULL);
>  		break;
> -	case CPU_ONLINE:
> +	case CPU_STARTING:
>  		printk(KERN_INFO "kvm: enabling virtualization on CPU%d\n",
>  		       cpu);
> -		smp_call_function_single(cpu, hardware_enable, NULL, 1);
> +		hardware_enable(NULL);
>  		break;
>  	}
>  	return NOTIFY_OK;
> @@ -2096,7 +2096,6 @@ int kvm_io_bus_unregister_dev(struct kvm *kvm, enum kvm_bus bus_idx,
>  
>  static struct notifier_block kvm_cpu_notifier = {
>  	.notifier_call = kvm_cpu_hotplug,
> -	.priority = 20, /* must be > scheduler priority */
>  };
>  
>  static int vm_stat_get(void *_offset, u64 *val)

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/