[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100827174313.GA26872@shell>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:43:13 -0400
From: Valerie Aurora <vaurora@...hat.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VFS: Sanity check mount flags passed to change_mnt_propagation()
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 07:14:36PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 04:03:18PM -0400, Valerie Aurora wrote:
> > + /* Fail if any non-propagation flags are set */
> > + if (type & ~(MS_SHARED | MS_PRIVATE | MS_SLAVE | MS_UNBINDABLE))
> > + return 0;
> > + /* Only one propagation flag should be set */
> > + if (((type & (MS_SHARED)) && (type & ~MS_SHARED)) ||
> > + ((type & (MS_PRIVATE)) && (type & ~MS_PRIVATE)) ||
> > + ((type & (MS_SLAVE)) && (type & ~MS_SLAVE)) ||
> > + ((type & (MS_UNBINDABLE)) && (type & ~MS_UNBINDABLE)))
> > + return 0;
>
> Hrm. I think we can do this a bit more pithily.
>
> /* Only one propagation flag should be set, and no others */
> if (hweight32(type) != 1 &&
> (type & ~(MS_SHARED | MS_PRIVATE | MS_SLAVE | MS_UNBINDABLE))
> return 0;
>
> Too clever?
I was hoping someone would go find the best bitop for me, thanks. :)
hweight32() is an awkward name but the comment makes it clear. I'm
happy with either.
Thanks for the help,
-VAL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists