[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1008272046410.2768@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 20:53:00 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
cc: Masayuki Ohtak <masa-korg@....okisemi.com>, meego-dev@...go.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
qi.wang@...el.com, yong.y.wang@...el.com,
andrew.chih.howe.khor@...el.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
gregkh@...e.de, Tomoya MORINAGA <morinaga526@....okisemi.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [MeeGo-Dev][PATCH] Topcliff: Update PCH_SPI driver to 2.6.35
B1;2401;0cOn Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Grant Likely wrote:
> [cc'ing Thomas Gleixner and David Woodhouse since this driver needs to
> get some data about the platform (to know what spi_devices are
> present) and I don't know how that is handled for x86 SoCs.]
The best way to do all this platform specific configuration is to use
device tree. I really don't want to have x86/mach-xyz/board[A-Z]
horror, which is unavoidable when we don't get a sensible way to
configure the boards. SFI was meant to provide a lightweight ACPI, but
now that device tree is generic and more platforms are using it, I
really want to standartize on that and forget SFI.
That makes even more sense, as all these AMBA peripherals which are
duct-taped to a x86 core can be found in other SoCs with different
cores as well.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists