[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C784A1C.8030602@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 01:28:28 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
CC: jaxboe@...ionio.com, k-ueda@...jp.nec.com, j-nomura@...jp.nec.com,
jamie@...reable.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
hch@....de, dm-devel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] dm: implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA support
Hello,
On 08/27/2010 10:24 PM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
>> * As __blk_rq_prep_clone() copies REQ_FUA, just advertising FUA
>> support is enough to pass through REQ_FUA to targets.
>
> You're doing blk_queue_flush(md->queue, REQ_FLUSH | REQ_FUA); in 2
> places:
> 1) generic dm_init_md_queue -- used for bio-based and request-based
> 2) request-based specific dm_init_request_based_queue.
Well, there are two places creating queues.
> Interestingly, we never used the old blk_queue_ordered() method for
> bio-based DM yet it is now using blk_queue_flush().
Yeap, because now __make_request() filters out REQ_FLUSH bio's.
> But how can we blindly assume/advertise REQ_FUA?
>
> Should we be taking more care to check each block device that DM
> consumes to see if FUA is supported and only then advertise REQ_FUA?
> DM already does this for discard support (see:
> dm_table_supports_discards).
Nope, REQ_FUA will be interpreted by queues lower in the stack.
Drivers in the middle just need to pass them through.
>> Lightly tested linear, stripe, raid1, snap and crypt targets.
>
> I tested the bio-based code with the LVM2 test suite and all tests
> passed.
>
>> Please proceed with caution as I'm not familiar with the code base.
>
> As I shared in an earlier (private) mail, I'm unfortunately having
> problems with request-based DM (when all patches in this series are
> applied). I'll be working on that more.
Heh... I probably should set up a simple dm-mpath and test it. I'll
do it this weekend.
> BTW, we can eliminate the dm_rq_is_flush_request() wrapper right? I
> think hch mentioned this at some point in one of the various threads.
Sure, that's a rather silly wrapper at this point.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists