linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] vmscan: fix missing place to check nr_swap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTinP_q7S4_O921hdBoedmTp-7gw0+=4DPHZGmysi@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:00:41 +0900
From:	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To:	Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vmscan: fix missing place to check nr_swap_pages.

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello.
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com> wrote:
>> > Fix a missed place where checks nr_swap_pages to do shrink_active_list. Make the
>> > change that moves the check to common function inactive_anon_is_low.
>> >
>>
>> Hmm.. AFAIR, we discussed it at that time but we concluded it's not good.
>> That's because nr_swap_pages < 0 means both "NO SWAP" and "NOT enough
>> swap space now". If we have a swap device or file but not enough space
>> now, we need to aging anon pages to make inactive list enough size.
>> Otherwise, working set pages would be swapped out more fast before
>> promotion.
>
> We found the problem on one of our workloads where more TLB flush
> happens without the change. Kswapd seems to be calling
> shrink_active_list() which eventually clears access bit of those ptes
> and does TLB flush
> with ptep_clear_flush_young(). This system does not have swap
> configured, and why aging the anon lru in that
> case?

True. I also wanted it but we have to care swap configured but
non-enabling still yet system as well as non-swap configured system at
that time.

If your system is no swap configured, how about this?
(It's a not formal proper patch but just quick patch to show the concept).

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 3109ff7..641c6a6 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1580,6 +1580,11 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long
nr_pages, struct zone *zone,
        spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
 }

+/*
+ * If system doesn't have a swap configuration,
+ * it doesn't need to age anon pages in kswapd.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_SWAP
 static int inactive_anon_is_low_global(struct zone *zone)
 {
        unsigned long active, inactive;
@@ -1611,6 +1616,12 @@ static int inactive_anon_is_low(struct zone
*zone, struct scan_control *sc)
                low = mem_cgroup_inactive_anon_is_low(sc->mem_cgroup);
        return low;
 }
+#else
+static inline int inactive_anon_is_low(struct zone *zone, struct
scan_control *sc)
+{
+       return 0;
+}
+#endif

 static int inactive_file_is_low_global(struct zone *zone)
 {


-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/