lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 28 Aug 2010 18:53:59 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc:	Thomas Dahlmann <dahlmann.thomas@...or.de>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	linux-geode@...ts.infradead.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] drivers/usb/gadget: Remove double test

On Sat, 28 Aug 2010, David Brownell wrote:

> Please update $SUBJECT to say which driver is
> affected;

Done.

> it's not everything in that directory,
> and accurate GIT summaries help a lot.

Is there some sort of rule that can be followed?  For example, if the 
patch affects only one, file, should that file be named?  What if the 
patch affects only two files?

thanks,
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ