[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimFWOqqCf_YmnMKDFsL_yQ4Sv3gpEihw1mjjtwc@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 21:38:27 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] x86-64: Disable preemption when using TS_USEDFPU
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> wrote:
> Consolidates code and fixes the below race for 64-bit.
>
> commit 9fa2f37bfeb798728241cc4a19578ce6e4258f25
> Author: torvalds <torvalds>
> Date: Tue Sep 2 07:37:25 2003 +0000
>
> Be a lot more careful about TS_USEDFPU and preemption
>
> We had some races where we testecd (or set) TS_USEDFPU together
> with sequences that depended on the setting (like clearing or
> setting the TS flag in %cr0) and we could be preempted in between,
> which screws up the FPU state, since preemption will itself change
> USEDFPU and the TS flag.
>
> This makes it a lot more explicit: the "internal" low-level FPU
> functions ("__xxxx_fpu()") all require preemption to be disabled,
> and the exported "real" functions will make sure that is the case.
>
> One case - in __switch_to() - was switched to the non-preempt-safe
> internal version, since the scheduler itself has already disabled
> preemption.
>
> BKrev: 3f5448b5WRiQuyzAlbajs3qoQjSobw
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists