linux-kernel

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Message-ID: <1236896997.1479691283083005518.JavaMail.root@zmail06.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
Date:	Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:56:45 -0400 (EDT)
From:	CAI Qian <caiqian@...hat.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	kexec <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kdump regression compared to v2.6.35


----- caiqian@...hat.com wrote:

> ----- "Tejun Heo" <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> >
> > On 08/29/2010 01:24 PM, CAI Qian wrote:
> > >> On 08/29/2010 09:01 AM, caiqian@...hat.com wrote:
> > >>> Further bisect indicated this bad commit from the merge. Given
> kdump
> > >>> kernel was running with maxcpus=1, I guess this work caused
> > fs/bio.c
> > >>> hung in the workqueue on UP. Reverted the whole merge let kdump
> > work
> > >>> again.
> > >>
> > >> Can you please pull from the following git tree and see whether
> it
> > >> fixes the problem?  There was a bug in nr_active accounting.
> > >
> > > It had the same problem.
> >
> > I see.  Hmm... a different issue then.  Can you please tell me how
> to
> > reproduce the problem?
It is easy to reproduce by passing maxcpus=1 to the first kernel.
> First, to configure kdump - see Documentation/kdump/kdump.txt. It
> might be easier if you are using a distro that provide advanced kdump
> tools. Then, to trigger the kdump - echo c >/proc/sysrq-trigger. In
> case needed, here is the system information,
> # lscpu
> Architecture:          x86_64
> CPU op-mode(s):        32-bit, 64-bit
> CPU(s):                64
> Thread(s) per core:    2
> Core(s) per socket:    8
> CPU socket(s):         4
> NUMA node(s):          4
> Vendor ID:             GenuineIntel
> CPU family:            6
> Model:                 46
> Stepping:              6
> CPU MHz:               1064.000
> Virtualization:        VT-x
> L1d cache:             32K
> L1i cache:             32K
> L2 cache:              256K
> L3 cache:              18432K
> NUMA node0 CPU(s):     0,4,8,12,16,20,24,28,32,36,40,44,48,52,56,60
> NUMA node1 CPU(s):     1,5,9,13,17,21,25,29,33,37,41,45,49,53,57,61
> NUMA node2 CPU(s):     2,6,10,14,18,22,26,30,34,38,42,46,50,54,58,62
> NUMA node3 CPU(s):     3,7,11,15,19,23,27,31,35,39,43,47,51,55,59,63
> 
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --
> > tejun
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > kexec mailing list
> > kexec@...ts.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives