linux-kernel - Re: kdump regression compared to v2.6.35

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C7A5455.7060905@kernel.org>
Date:	Sun, 29 Aug 2010 14:36:37 +0200
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	CAI Qian <caiqian@...hat.com>
CC:	kexec <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kdump regression compared to v2.6.35

Hello,

On 08/29/2010 02:03 PM, CAI Qian wrote:
> 
> ----- "Tejun Heo" <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 08/29/2010 01:56 PM, CAI Qian wrote:
>>> It is easy to reproduce by passing maxcpus=1 to the first kernel.
>>
>> Do you mean booting w/ maxcpus=1 hangs the first kernel even w/o
>> kdump?
> Yes, here was the log,

Hmmm... I can't reproduce it here.  I wonder what the difference is.
Can you please trigger sysrq-t after the boot is hung and post the
result?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/