lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:40:55 +0200 From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com> Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/43] ptrace: change signature of arch_ptrace() On Friday 27 August 2010 18:20:55 Namhyung Kim wrote: > Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> writes: > > Would it be possible to rearrange your patches so that you don't break > > anything in the middle? I think merging all the trivial 'change signature' > > patches into one would also make reviewing easier. Nobody in their > > right mind is looking through a full series of 43 patches, especially > > if they do not make sense on their own, but one patch that changes a > > function signature tree-wide would be looked at by many people and can > > be applied standalone. > > > > OK. Will combine those. > BTW, one thing I wonder is it will have huge CC list of arch maintainers > in commit message, so is it usual? or is there other way? I'd say you don't have to for a trivial patch such at this, as long as you keep linux-arch@...r.kernel.org on Cc, since that has all the arch maintainers. It also doesn't hurt to keep them all on Cc, since it would only be a single mail then. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists