| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <AANLkTikXeC--5PuuhmJgxDr8MAg97rC5OecsV3HNPz=g@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 21:32:59 +0300 From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org> To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> Cc: hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] x86: Merge tolerant_fwait() On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> wrote: > Now that 32-bit can handle exceptions from the kernel, switch to using > the 64-bit version of tolerant_fwait() without fnclex. In the unlikely > event an exception is triggered, it is simply ignored. > > Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> Why is 32-bit able to handle exceptions? Is that part of this series or is it some existing commit in tip or linus? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists