[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTin6pZq_JquweSMrWfZsCM79v=1TqUConNa85rFN@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 20:44:06 -0400
From: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Cc: hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] x86: Merge fpu_init()
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> wrote:
>> @@ -80,7 +80,6 @@ static void __cpuinit init_thread_xstate(void)
>> #endif
>> }
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>> /*
>> * Called at bootup to set up the initial FPU state that is later cloned
>> * into all processes.
>> @@ -88,12 +87,20 @@ static void __cpuinit init_thread_xstate(void)
>>
>> void __cpuinit fpu_init(void)
>> {
>> - unsigned long oldcr0 = read_cr0();
>> + unsigned long cr0;
>> + unsigned long cr4_mask = 0;
>>
>> - set_in_cr4(X86_CR4_OSFXSR);
>> - set_in_cr4(X86_CR4_OSXMMEXCPT);
>> + if (cpu_has_fxsr)
>> + cr4_mask |= X86_CR4_OSFXSR;
>> + if (cpu_has_xmm)
>> + cr4_mask |= X86_CR4_OSXMMEXCPT;
>> + set_in_cr4(cr4_mask);
>
> Is calling set_in_cr4() unconditionally safe for 32-bit CPUs that
> don't have cr4? AFAICT, no, because it uses read_cr4().
>
Good catch, will fix.
--
Brian Gerst
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists