[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100830125556.GL1473@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:55:56 +0200
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.ml.walleij@...il.com>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 v2] dmaengine: Add Freescale i.MX SDMA support
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 02:35:01PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> 2010/8/28 Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>:
>
> > Peripherals integrated into a SoC like the SDMA engine here are
> > normally accessible in native endianess and thus need the __raw_*
> > functions.
>
> So the SDMA actually switch and twist around the endianness of
> its registers if it's synthesized into a bigendian version of the system?
>
> Or hardware-dynamically even depending on the setting of the
> endianness bit in the ARM core?
I think it's the bus between the ARM core and the periherals which
changes the endianess. I have never tried running an i.MX in big endian
mode, so I can only guess how the system really behaves in BE mode.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists