[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1008300721400.175@Macintosh-3.local>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 07:22:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] eventfd semaphore-like behavior
On Mon, 30 Aug 2010, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 2:02 AM, Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
> >
> >> > Dunno. Probably try the syscall and see if it returned -EINVAL. Does
> >> > that work in this case?
> >>
> >> As youll have seen by now, Ulrich and I noted that it works.
> >>
> >> > If so, it would be sensible to mention this in
> >> > the description somewhere as the approved probing method and to
> >> > maintain it.
> >>
> >> I'll add something to the man page, as this patch progresses.
> >
> > I see we already have stuff like this inside the man pages:
> >
> > O_CLOEXEC (Since Linux 2.6.23)
> > Enable the close-on-exec flag for the new file descriptor.
> > ...
> >
> > Maybe a similar note for the new flag?
>
> It took a while, but here's the new text in the eventfd.2 (will be in
> man-pages-2.36). Could you please ACK, Davide?
>
> EFD_SEMAPHORE (since Linux 2.6.30)
> Provide semaphore-like semantics for reads from
> the new file descriptor. See below.
> ...
> * If EFD_SEMAPHORE was not specified and the
> eventfd counter has a nonzero value, then a
> read(2) returns 8 bytes containing that value,
> and the counter's value is reset to zero.
>
> * If EFD_SEMAPHORE was specified and the eventfd
> counter has a nonzero value, then a read(2)
> returns 8 bytes containing the value 1, and the
> counter's value is decremented by 1.
Looks fine to me.
- Davide
Powered by blists - more mailing lists