[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=F3xYJ5_umQTT9N7RqQBL04162RVEka5A9YgYN@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:56:28 -0400
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] tty/hw: move hardware drivers to drivers/tty/hw
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 08:28, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 30 August 2010, Alan Cox wrote:
>> > My impression was that it should actually be converted into an hvc
>> > driver as a cleanup and moved to drivers/tty/hvc. It can probably
>> > get reduced to one third of its size if you do that.
>>
>> Not sure it makes sense - hvc seems the wrong abstraction.
>
> It seems to be very similar to hvc_tile.c in purpose, which is
> the most trivial driver we have. Why would that not work?
>
> Most of bfin_jtag_comm is about interfacing with the tty layer
> and providing a kernel thread to do the polling, which is exactly
> what hvc_console.c does.
i have no idea what "hvc" is, but my limited knowledge was that it was
for large powerpc servers, so i didnt bother looking at it too much.
i simply wanted a way to create a tty on top of the hardware channel.
if there is a framework that doesnt break this usage and lets me
simplify my driver, then either works for me.
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists