[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100830193558.GE24828@console-pimps.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:35:58 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/5] perf: Add hrtimer code for PMI-less hardware
counters
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 04:12:24PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 14:27 +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
>
> > I'm lost. Is it possible to do this patch entirely in userspace? How do
> > we periodically sample the counters if it's not being done in the
> > kernel?
>
> perf_event_attr leader = {
> .type = PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE,
> .config = PERF_COUNT_SW_TASK_CLOCK,
> .sample_period = xxx,
> .sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_READ|...,
> .read_format = PERF_FORMAT_GROUP,
> };
>
> perf_event_attr counter = {
> .type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE,
> .config = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES,
> };
>
> leader_fd = sys_perf_event_open(&leader, pid, cpu, 0, 0);
> counter_fd = sys_perf_event_open(&counter, pid, cpu, leader_fd, 0);
>
> Which gives you a group of 2 events, one software timer that samples,
> one hardware counter that only counts.
Aha. OK, thanks! I'll respin this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists