[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x4939tv98n8.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:56:43 -0400
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
jaxboe@...ionio.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
James.Bottomley@...e.de, tytso@....edu, chris.mason@...cle.com,
swhiteho@...hat.com, konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp,
dm-devel@...hat.com, vst@...b.net, rwheeler@...hat.com,
hare@...e.de, neilb@...e.de, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, mst@...hat.com,
jeremy@...p.org, snitzer@...hat.com, k-ueda@...jp.nec.com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/30] ext4: do not send discards as barriers
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> writes:
> An update: I've set up an ext4 barrier testing in KVM - run fsstress,
> kill KVM at some random moment and check that the filesystem is consistent
> (kvm is run in cache=writeback mode to simulate disk cache). About 70 runs
But doesn't your "disk cache" survive the "power cycle" of your guest?
It's tough to tell exactly what you're testing with so few details;
care to elaborate?
Cheers,
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists