linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 26/30] ext4: do not send discards as barriers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4C7C170D.9090409@vlnb.net>
Date:	Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:39:41 +0400
From:	Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@...b.net>
To:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
CC:	Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, jaxboe@...ionio.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@...e.de, tytso@....edu,
	chris.mason@...cle.com, swhiteho@...hat.com,
	konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp, dm-devel@...hat.com,
	rwheeler@...hat.com, hare@...e.de, neilb@...e.de,
	rusty@...tcorp.com.au, mst@...hat.com, jeremy@...p.org,
	snitzer@...hat.com, k-ueda@...jp.nec.com,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/30] ext4: do not send discards as barriers

Jan Kara, on 08/31/2010 12:20 AM wrote:
> On Mon 30-08-10 15:56:43, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> Jan Kara<jack@...e.cz>  writes:
>>
>>>    An update: I've set up an ext4 barrier testing in KVM - run fsstress,
>>> kill KVM at some random moment and check that the filesystem is consistent
>>> (kvm is run in cache=writeback mode to simulate disk cache). About 70 runs
>>
>> But doesn't your "disk cache" survive the "power cycle" of your guest?
>    Yes, you're right. Thinking about it now the test setup was wrong because
> it didn't refuse writes to the VM's data partition after the moment I
> killed KVM. Thanks for catching this. I will probably have to use the fault
> injection on the host to disallow writing the device at a certain moment.
> Or does somebody have a better option?

Have you considered to setup a second box as an iSCSI target (e.g. with 
iSCSI-SCST)? With it killing the connectivity is just a matter of a 
single iptables command + a lot more options.

Vlad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/