[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C7B45F1.7000503@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 08:47:29 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
CC: hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] x86: Merge tolerant_fwait()
On 8/30/10 3:35 AM, Brian Gerst wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Pekka Enberg<penberg@...nel.org> wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Brian Gerst<brgerst@...il.com> wrote:
>>> Now that 32-bit can handle exceptions from the kernel, switch to using
>>> the 64-bit version of tolerant_fwait() without fnclex. In the unlikely
>>> event an exception is triggered, it is simply ignored.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst<brgerst@...il.com>
>> Why is 32-bit able to handle exceptions? Is that part of this series
>> or is it some existing commit in tip or linus?
>>
> Commit e2e75c915de045f0785387dc32f55e92fab0614c merged the 32-bit and
> 64-bit math exception handlers into one, which calls
> fixup_exception().
That could be in the changelog.
Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists