| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4C7B5F64.30205@suse.cz> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:36:04 +0200 From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz> To: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com> CC: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>, lenb@...nel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ACPI: pci_irq, add PRT_ quirk for IBM Bartolo On 08/25/2010 01:25 AM, Robert Hancock wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com> wrote: >> So, to sum up: >> 1) acpi routing enabled (no kernel parameter) => ports 4+5 defunct. >> ports 4+5+6+7 are all on irq 11 >> >> 2) acpi routing disabled (acpi=noirq) => all ports working, 4+5 on irq >> 10, 6+7 on irq 11 >> >> 3) with the quirk [1] and acpi routing enabled => all ports working, >> ports 4+5 on irq 10, 6+7 on irq 11 >> >> 4) in windows => 4+5+6+7 are all on irq 9 and the ports are all working. >> >> Any ideas what this means? Especially point 4)? >> >> [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/27/85 > > I think that's the key question. Is Windows actually using ACPI on > that machine at all? (Check the computer type in Device Manager and > see if it mentions ACPI.) Yes, there is Computer->ACPI PC. thanks, -- js suse labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists