[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTinEtFhC6kB3asuBXLxCgYf9yOTLTTwRQJXKcu2n@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 02:28:59 -0400
From: "Mark F. Brown" <mark.brown314@...il.com>
To: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>
Cc: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...vell.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] ARM: pxa168: added special case handler for keypad interrupts
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Haojian Zhuang
<haojian.zhuang@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Mark F. Brown <mark.brown314@...il.com> wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Mark F. Brown <mark.brown314@...il.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-mmp/irq-pxa168.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mmp/irq-pxa168.c b/arch/arm/mach-mmp/irq-pxa168.c
>> index 52ff2f0..bfb0984 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mmp/irq-pxa168.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mmp/irq-pxa168.c
>> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
>> #include <linux/io.h>
>>
>> #include <mach/regs-icu.h>
>> +#include <mach/regs-apmu.h>
>> +#include <mach/cputype.h>
>>
>> #include "common.h"
>>
>> @@ -42,6 +44,19 @@ static struct irq_chip icu_irq_chip = {
>> .unmask = icu_unmask_irq,
>> };
>>
>> +void handle_pxa168_keypad_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
>> +{
>> + uint32_t val;
>> + uint32_t mask = APMU_PXA168_KP_WAKE_CLR;
>> +
>> + /* clear keypad wake event */
>> + val = __raw_readl(APMU_WAKE_CLR);
>> + __raw_writel(val | mask, APMU_WAKE_CLR);
>> +
>> + /* handle irq */
>> + handle_level_irq(irq, desc);
>> +}
>> +
>
> Why should you clear wakeup event status in IRQ handler? If system is
> resumed by keypad event, you should clear this wakeup source in resume
> code. I think that IRQ code should not be binded with wakeup event at
> here.
>
>> void __init icu_init_irq(void)
>> {
>> int irq;
>> @@ -49,7 +64,13 @@ void __init icu_init_irq(void)
>> for (irq = 0; irq < 64; irq++) {
>> icu_mask_irq(irq);
>> set_irq_chip(irq, &icu_irq_chip);
>> - set_irq_handler(irq, handle_level_irq);
>> +
>> + /* special handler for keypad */
>> + if (cpu_is_pxa168() && irq == IRQ_PXA168_KEYPAD)
>> + set_irq_handler(irq, handle_pxa168_keypad_irq);
>> + else
>> + set_irq_handler(irq, handle_level_irq);
>> +
>> set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID);
>> }
>> }
>> --
>> 1.7.0.4
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>
>
Haojian, this is an usual case, but without that clear wake event you
will not be able to clear the keypad interrupt. For my push to open
source I re-wrote the workaround code and added it as a special case
IRQ handler. In the Marvell pxa168 code base it is actually located in
the keypad interrupt handler as the function clear_wakeup(). I felt it
was better to isolate this code in the mmp common code base instead.
Regards,
-- Mark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists