[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1283215653.1377.41.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:47:33 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Richard Kennedy <richard@....demon.co.uk>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: TRACE: config warning for IRQSOFF_TRACER
On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 15:52 +0100, Richard Kennedy wrote:
> In my config with PROVE_LOCKING=n and FTRACE=y (which defaults
> IRQSOFF_TRACER to y), I get the following warning from make oldconfig.
>
> scripts/kconfig/conf --oldconfig arch/x86/Kconfig
> warning: (IRQSOFF_TRACER && TRACING_SUPPORT && FTRACE &&
> TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT && !ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET) selects
> TRACE_IRQFLAGS which has unmet direct dependencies (DEBUG_KERNEL &&
> TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT && PROVE_LOCKING)
>
> The problem is that TRACE_IRQFLAGS depends on PROVE_LOCKING.
> Should it select PROVE_LOCKING instead? or is there a better way to fix
> this?
The TRACE_IRQFLAGS was originally written for lockdep, but it is now
used by Ftrace's irqsoff tracer.
I just compiled and booted with TRACE_IRQFLAGS=y and PROVE_LOCKING not
set, and it worked fine.
I think the correct patch is to remove the dependency of TRACE_IRQFLAGS
on PROVE_LOCKING.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists