| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <AANLkTik-AHuFLk8-B0vnE0m3Rjvumu_H9f-5Wu6a4g29@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:28:54 +0800
From: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>
To: "Mark F. Brown" <mark.brown314@...il.com>
Cc: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...vell.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: pxa168: fix corrected reset vector
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Mark F. Brown <mark.brown314@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 3:21 AM, Haojian Zhuang
> <haojian.zhuang@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Haojian Zhuang
>>> <haojian.zhuang@...il.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Mark F. Brown <mark.brown314@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Haojian Zhuang
>>>>> <haojian.zhuang@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:08 PM, Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Mark F. Brown <mark.brown314@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:48 AM, Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Mark F. Brown <mark.brown314@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Mark F. Brown <mark.brown314@...il.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>> arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/system.h | 2 +-
>>>>>>>>>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/system.h b/arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/system.h
>>>>>>>>>>> index 4f5b0e0..926e9c0 100644
>>>>>>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/system.h
>>>>>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/system.h
>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -16,6 +16,6 @@ static inline void arch_idle(void)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> static inline void arch_reset(char mode, const char *cmd)
>>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>>> - cpu_reset(0);
>>>>>>>>>>> + cpu_reset(0xffff0000);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Not sure if this correct. But normally reset jump happens after we turn
>>>>>>>>>> off the MMU and so on. Ain't the BootROM starts from 0 ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>> #endif /* __ASM_MACH_SYSTEM_H */
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> 1.7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Eric, the boot-rom for pxa168 starts at 0xffff_0000. I am pretty sure
>>>>>>>>> about that! If you set the reset vector to 0x0 it will crash during
>>>>>>>>> reboot. I will send you xdb snapshots if you need me to.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> OK, you are expert on this :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Applied to 'fix'.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> One moment. Since this is really global to pxa910 and mmp2, so I
>>>>>>> suggest this being fixed for pxa168 only first. How about this:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ARM: pxa168: fix corrected reset vector
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Reset vector for pxa168 is 0xffff_0000 not 0x0. This fix allows
>>>>>>> reboot to work
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Mark F. Brown <mark.brown314@...il.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/system.h
>>>>>>> b/arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/system.h
>>>>>>> index 4f5b0e0..1a8a25e 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/system.h
>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/system.h
>>>>>>> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
>>>>>>> #ifndef __ASM_MACH_SYSTEM_H
>>>>>>> #define __ASM_MACH_SYSTEM_H
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +#include <mach/cputype.h>
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> static inline void arch_idle(void)
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>> cpu_do_idle();
>>>>>>> @@ -16,6 +18,9 @@ static inline void arch_idle(void)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> static inline void arch_reset(char mode, const char *cmd)
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>> - cpu_reset(0);
>>>>>>> + if (cpu_is_pxa168())
>>>>>>> + cpu_reset(0xffff0000);
>>>>>>> + else
>>>>>>> + cpu_reset(0);
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> #endif /* __ASM_MACH_SYSTEM_H */
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>>>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>>>>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>>>>> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> The reset code is in below.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> .align 5
>>>>>> ENTRY(cpu_mohawk_reset)
>>>>>> mov ip, #0
>>>>>> mcr p15, 0, ip, c7, c7, 0 @ invalidate I,D caches
>>>>>> mcr p15, 0, ip, c7, c10, 4 @ drain WB
>>>>>> mcr p15, 0, ip, c8, c7, 0 @ invalidate I & D TLBs
>>>>>> mrc p15, 0, ip, c1, c0, 0 @ ctrl register
>>>>>> bic ip, ip, #0x0007 @ .............cam
>>>>>> bic ip, ip, #0x1100 @ ...i...s........
>>>>>> mcr p15, 0, ip, c1, c0, 0 @ ctrl register
>>>>>> mov pc, r0
>>>>>>
>>>>>> MMU is disabled at here and replace PC with r0 value. I doubt code
>>>>>> executed correctly at here. While MMU is disabled, the PC should be
>>>>>> continue in the range of 0xCxxx_xxxx (kernel space). "mov pc, r0"
>>>>>> shouldn't be executed. Instruction fetch failure should occurs since
>>>>>> there's no physical address in 0xCxxx_xxxx.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Correct me if I'm wrong.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Haojian
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Haojian,
>>>>>
>>>>> I think there is a pipeline execution of the mov pc, r0 instruction.
>>>>> If I remember correctly you need to do a similar jump when you turn
>>>>> the MMU on in early boot code. If it makes any difference I did test
>>>>> this code on pxa168 before submitting it. I will double check the mmp2
>>>>> and the pxa910 reset vectors with the Boot ROM developers.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In early boot code, 1:1 (physical:virtual) mapping is used. It means
>>>> that physical address is same as virtual address. So you can operature
>>>> mmu as you wish.
>>>>
>>>> By the way, I don't suggest to reset CPU by this way. Reset is not
>>>> only make code running from the head, it should also clear registers
>>>> and RTL logic in CPU.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Depends on if pxa168 has a reset signal asserted from internal or from
>>> external GPIO, which is controllable from the CPU itself. That's what
>>> pxa is doing at this moment.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, it depends on reset signal. Watchdog timer is built in pxa168. So
>> I think that watchdog reset could be better.
>>
>
> Haojian,
>
> That is true, I am planning to send an update to support watchdog
> timer reset soon. The problem is I need to test pxa910 and mmp2 as
> well and determine if the watchdog reset code is consistent. It was
> simpler for me to just fix this at the moment.
>
This fix can go ahead in my POV.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists