[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1283268367.3284.154.camel@dhcp231-106.rdu.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 11:26:07 -0400
From: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
To: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@...hat.com>
Cc: Harald Hoyer <harald@...hat.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
greg@...ah.com, sds@...ho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: selinux vs devtmpfs (vs udev)
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 11:22 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 08/31/2010 11:16 AM, Eric Paris wrote:
> > I suggest a third options: Calculate the default at startup and on every
> > policy load and fix object labels if they are the default. I'm sure Dan
> > knows a code example of how to do the calculation. The pseudocode looks
> > something like:
>
>
> >
> > lookup the label on /dev
> > lookup the label on the initial task
> > ask the kernel what the resulting label on a file transition with those
> > two pieces of information will be.
>
>
> NOOOOO
>
> libvirt is going in and changing fixed_disk_device_t:s0 to svirt_t:c0,c124
>
> We do not want udev to see this and ask what label a device should have
> if libvirtd_t created a chr_file in device_t.
initial task == /sbin/init
actually I should look if the kernel init_cred (what devtmpfs uses to
make security decisions) is initrc_t or kernel_t. I'm guessing it is
kernel_t but I'm not certain how that gets set.....
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists