[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1283275388.1377.216.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:23:08 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ksummit-2010-discuss@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2010-discuss] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add U: for URL of
todo list, add RCU todo list
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 09:38 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> I have to say that I'm not yet convinced that keeping a todo list in a
> place that's not with the actual source code does not give me warm
> fuzzy feelings. Every time we've kept information about the source code
> separate from our source code it's been a failure; it gets out of sync
> fast and it just adds to the maintenance.
>
> A git commit that both fixes an issue and removed the line from the
> todo file (or moves it to a "done" section, whatever) is the ultimate
> goal obviously... having a U: seems to go in exactly the opposite
> direction.
>
> otoh having a kernel-doc type (eg structured, parsable) way of
> gathering todo items throughout the tree.... that I can see as useful.
We could add a toplevel "todo/" directory, with each project file in it
and a list of things todo. When the todo is done, that same commit could
remove the todo item.
Just a worthless thought ;-)
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists