[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-68d3f1d810500e8b975bdf0b20dd83d060076b4b@git.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 09:19:10 GMT
From: tip-bot for Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
gorcunov@...nvz.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu,
dzickus@...hat.com
Subject: [tip:perf/urgent] lockup_detector: Sync touch_*_watchdog back to old semantics
Commit-ID: 68d3f1d810500e8b975bdf0b20dd83d060076b4b
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/68d3f1d810500e8b975bdf0b20dd83d060076b4b
Author: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:00:07 -0400
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 10:02:28 +0200
lockup_detector: Sync touch_*_watchdog back to old semantics
During my rewrite, the semantics of touch_nmi_watchdog and
touch_softlockup_watchdog changed enough to break some drivers
(mostly over preemptable regions).
These are cases where long delays on one CPU (due to
print_delay for example) can cause long delays on other
CPUs - so we must 'touch' the nmi_watchdog flag of those
other CPUs as well.
This change brings those touch_*_watchdog() functions back in line
with to how they used to work.
Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org
Cc: fweisbec@...il.com
LKML-Reference: <1283310009-22168-2-git-send-email-dzickus@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
kernel/watchdog.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
index 0d53c8e..7f9c3c5 100644
--- a/kernel/watchdog.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ static void __touch_watchdog(void)
void touch_softlockup_watchdog(void)
{
- __get_cpu_var(watchdog_touch_ts) = 0;
+ __raw_get_cpu_var(watchdog_touch_ts) = 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(touch_softlockup_watchdog);
@@ -142,7 +142,14 @@ void touch_all_softlockup_watchdogs(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR
void touch_nmi_watchdog(void)
{
- __get_cpu_var(watchdog_nmi_touch) = true;
+ if (watchdog_enabled) {
+ unsigned cpu;
+
+ for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
+ if (per_cpu(watchdog_nmi_touch, cpu) != true)
+ per_cpu(watchdog_nmi_touch, cpu) = true;
+ }
+ }
touch_softlockup_watchdog();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(touch_nmi_watchdog);
@@ -433,6 +440,9 @@ static int watchdog_enable(int cpu)
wake_up_process(p);
}
+ /* if any cpu succeeds, watchdog is considered enabled for the system */
+ watchdog_enabled = 1;
+
return 0;
}
@@ -455,9 +465,6 @@ static void watchdog_disable(int cpu)
per_cpu(softlockup_watchdog, cpu) = NULL;
kthread_stop(p);
}
-
- /* if any cpu succeeds, watchdog is considered enabled for the system */
- watchdog_enabled = 1;
}
static void watchdog_enable_all_cpus(void)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists