[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1283300000.1377.863.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:13:20 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>, acme@...radead.org,
fweisbec@...il.com, mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/9] mce: Add persistent events
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 16:57 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 16:25 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > +static const struct file_operations perf_mce_fops = {
> > + .llseek = no_llseek,
> > + .open = mce_perf_open,
> > + .poll = perf_poll,
> > + .unlocked_ioctl = perf_ioctl,
> > + .compat_ioctl = perf_ioctl,
> > + .mmap = perf_mmap,
> > + .fasync = perf_fasync,
> > + .release = perf_release,
> > +};
>
> I'd rather see this part of the persistent bits live in
> kernel/perf_event.c, that way you don't need the previous patch either.
>
This is part of what I hate about the perf design. The fact that
everything needs to be very coupled. I would like the infrastructure to
be more flexible.
If this does not work, we should have a better internal API that lets
this be done. Otherwise we will have this mce fops in core code that has
no business being there.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists