[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201009020031.08750.konrad@darnok.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 00:31:07 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nok.org>
To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
Cc: "linux-scsi" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 02/22] configfs: Add struct configfs_item_operations->check_link() in configfs_unlink()
On Monday 30 August 2010 05:20:25 Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
>
> This patch adds a optional struct configfs_item_operations->check_link()
> check called in fs/configfs/symlink.c:configfs_unlink() that can be used by
> configfs consumers to check for an explict struct config_group dependence
> with active symlink and fail with -EPERM before the unlink(2) syscall is
> allowed to occur.
>
> Currently without this patch, there is not a method that a consumer can
> tell configfs_unlink() that it needs to fail for this particular case.
> Allowing ->check_link() to propigate up the errno to VFS is also another
> option for the call, but currently for TCM using the existing -EPERM in
> configfs_unlink() is fine here.
>
> Note this patch is used by TCM v4 generic configfs fabric module
> infrastructure to allow explict Initiator Port MappedLUNs symlinks to
> create a dependency for the fabric TPG Port LUNs living in a configfs group
> that is not a direct struct config_group parent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
> ---
> fs/configfs/symlink.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> include/linux/configfs.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/configfs/symlink.c b/fs/configfs/symlink.c
> index 0f3eb41..b8010de 100644
> --- a/fs/configfs/symlink.c
> +++ b/fs/configfs/symlink.c
> @@ -205,6 +205,19 @@ int configfs_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry
> *dentry) parent_item = configfs_get_config_item(dentry->d_parent);
> type = parent_item->ci_type;
>
> + /*
> + * See if the underlying struct config_item has dependent
> + * symlinks, and should return -EPERM here.
> + */
> + if (type && type->ct_item_ops &&
> + type->ct_item_ops->check_link) {
> + if (type->ct_item_ops->check_link(parent_item,
> + sl->sl_target) != 0) {
> + config_item_put(parent_item);
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
> +
> spin_lock(&configfs_dirent_lock);
> list_del_init(&sd->s_sibling);
> spin_unlock(&configfs_dirent_lock);
> diff --git a/include/linux/configfs.h b/include/linux/configfs.h
> index ddb7a97..7c01d86 100644
> --- a/include/linux/configfs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/configfs.h
> @@ -226,6 +226,7 @@ struct configfs_item_operations {
> ssize_t (*show_attribute)(struct config_item *, struct configfs_attribute
> *,char *); ssize_t (*store_attribute)(struct config_item *,struct
> configfs_attribute *,const char *, size_t); int (*allow_link)(struct
> config_item *src, struct config_item *target); + int (*check_link)(struct
> config_item *src, struct config_item *target); int (*drop_link)(struct
> config_item *src, struct config_item *target); };
You might want to copy these folks:
git/linux$ scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f fs/configfs/symlink.c
Joel Becker <joel.becker@...cle.com>
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists