| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <4C7FB8370200007800013F40@vpn.id2.novell.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:44:07 +0100
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...ell.com>
To: <mingo@...e.hu>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: <r.marek@...embler.cz>, <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
<lm-sensors@...sensors.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/hwmon: fix configuration and initialization of
coretemp and pkgtemp
- using cpuid_eax() to determine feature availability on other than
the current CPU is invalid
- feature availability shopuld also be check in the hotplug code path
- pkgtemp doesn't depend on PCI altogether (apparently just inherited
from coretemp)
- coretemp really only needs PCI for Atom support
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>
Cc: Rudolf Marek <r.marek@...embler.cz>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c | 1 +
drivers/hwmon/Kconfig | 5 +++--
drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c | 30 ++++++++++++++----------------
drivers/hwmon/pkgtemp.c | 11 +++--------
5 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.36-rc3/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ 2.6.36-rc3-x86-hwmon/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -168,6 +168,7 @@
#define X86_FEATURE_XSAVEOPT (7*32+ 4) /* Optimized Xsave */
#define X86_FEATURE_PLN (7*32+ 5) /* Intel Power Limit Notification */
#define X86_FEATURE_PTS (7*32+ 6) /* Intel Package Thermal Status */
+#define X86_FEATURE_DTS (7*32+31) /* Digital Thermal Sensor */
/* Virtualization flags: Linux defined, word 8 */
#define X86_FEATURE_TPR_SHADOW (8*32+ 0) /* Intel TPR Shadow */
--- linux-2.6.36-rc3/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
+++ 2.6.36-rc3-x86-hwmon/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ void __cpuinit init_scattered_cpuid_feat
const struct cpuid_bit *cb;
static const struct cpuid_bit __cpuinitconst cpuid_bits[] = {
+ { X86_FEATURE_DTS, CR_EAX, 0, 0x00000006, 0 },
{ X86_FEATURE_IDA, CR_EAX, 1, 0x00000006, 0 },
{ X86_FEATURE_ARAT, CR_EAX, 2, 0x00000006, 0 },
{ X86_FEATURE_PLN, CR_EAX, 4, 0x00000006, 0 },
--- linux-2.6.36-rc3/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
+++ 2.6.36-rc3-x86-hwmon/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
@@ -401,7 +401,8 @@ config SENSORS_GL520SM
config SENSORS_CORETEMP
tristate "Intel Core/Core2/Atom temperature sensor"
- depends on X86 && PCI && EXPERIMENTAL
+ depends on X86 && EXPERIMENTAL
+ depends on PCI || (!MATOM && !GENERIC_CPU && !X86_GENERIC)
help
If you say yes here you get support for the temperature
sensor inside your CPU. Most of the family 6 CPUs
@@ -409,7 +410,7 @@ config SENSORS_CORETEMP
config SENSORS_PKGTEMP
tristate "Intel processor package temperature sensor"
- depends on X86 && PCI && EXPERIMENTAL
+ depends on X86 && EXPERIMENTAL
help
If you say yes here you get support for the package level temperature
sensor inside your CPU. Check documentation/driver for details.
--- linux-2.6.36-rc3/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
+++ 2.6.36-rc3-x86-hwmon/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
@@ -423,9 +423,18 @@ static int __cpuinit coretemp_device_add
int err;
struct platform_device *pdev;
struct pdev_entry *pdev_entry;
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
-#endif
+
+ /*
+ * CPUID.06H.EAX[0] indicates whether the CPU has thermal
+ * sensors. We check this bit only, all the early CPUs
+ * without thermal sensors will be filtered out.
+ */
+ if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_DTS)) {
+ printk(KERN_INFO DRVNAME ": CPU (model=0x%x)"
+ " has no thermal sensor.\n", c->x86_model);
+ return 0;
+ }
mutex_lock(&pdev_list_mutex);
@@ -527,20 +536,9 @@ static int __init coretemp_init(void)
if (err)
goto exit;
- for_each_online_cpu(i) {
- struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(i);
- /*
- * CPUID.06H.EAX[0] indicates whether the CPU has thermal
- * sensors. We check this bit only, all the early CPUs
- * without thermal sensors will be filtered out.
- */
- if (c->cpuid_level >= 6 && (cpuid_eax(0x06) & 0x01))
- coretemp_device_add(i);
- else {
- printk(KERN_INFO DRVNAME ": CPU (model=0x%x)"
- " has no thermal sensor.\n", c->x86_model);
- }
- }
+ for_each_online_cpu(i)
+ coretemp_device_add(i);
+
if (list_empty(&pdev_list)) {
err = -ENODEV;
goto exit_driver_unreg;
--- linux-2.6.36-rc3/drivers/hwmon/pkgtemp.c
+++ 2.6.36-rc3-x86-hwmon/drivers/hwmon/pkgtemp.c
@@ -33,7 +33,6 @@
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/cpu.h>
-#include <linux/pci.h>
#include <asm/msr.h>
#include <asm/processor.h>
@@ -281,9 +280,10 @@ static int __cpuinit pkgtemp_device_add(
int err;
struct platform_device *pdev;
struct pdev_entry *pdev_entry;
-#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
-#endif
+
+ if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_PTS))
+ return 0;
mutex_lock(&pdev_list_mutex);
@@ -399,11 +399,6 @@ static int __init pkgtemp_init(void)
goto exit;
for_each_online_cpu(i) {
- struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(i);
-
- if (!cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_PTS))
- continue;
-
err = pkgtemp_device_add(i);
if (err)
goto exit_devices_unreg;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists