[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100902135438.GA23729@merkur.ravnborg.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 15:54:38 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: gerg@...pgear.com, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] M68K: Use CONFIG_MMU not __uClinux__ to select
m68knommu contributions
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 11:21:58AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Use CONFIG_MMU not __uClinux__ to select m68knommu contributions as nothing in
> the arch defines __uClinux__ for the build.
>
> This patch was achieved by running the following three commands:
>
> perl -pi -e 's/ifdef __uClinux__/ifndef CONFIG_MMU/' `find arch/m68k -name "*.[ch]"`
> perl -pi -e 's/ifndef __uClinux__/ifdef CONFIG_MMU/' `find arch/m68k -name "*.[ch]"`
> perl -pi -e 's!endif /[*] __uClinux__ [*]/!endif /* CONFIG_MMU */!' `find arch/m68k -name "*.[ch]"
Have you verified that this does not leak out
to the userspace headers?
We cannot use the CONFIG_ symbol to distingush between
the two variants in userspace.
This was exactly the reason why __uClinux__ was used
in the first place. But I hope Geert/Greg has fixed
it up so all exported headers are the same so that
this patch is OK.
At first look I think it is OK - but your changelog
does not address this so wanted you to confirm this.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists