lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1283437931-11754-1-git-send-email-minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu,  2 Sep 2010 23:32:11 +0900
From:	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Iram Shahzad <iram.shahzad@...fujitsu.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Subject: [RESEND PATCH v2] compaction: handle active and inactive fairly in too_many_isolated

Iram reported compaction's too_many_isolated loops forever.
(http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg08123.html)

The meminfo of situation happened was inactive anon is zero.
That's because the system has no memory pressure until then.
While all anon pages was in active lru, compaction could select
active lru as well as inactive lru. That's a different thing
with vmscan's isolated. So we has been two too_many_isolated.

While compaction can isolated pages in both active and inactive,
current implementation of too_many_isolated only considers inactive.
It made Iram's problem.

This patch handles active and inactive with fair.
That's because we can't expect where from and how many compaction would
isolated pages.

This patch changes (nr_isolated > nr_inactive) with
nr_isolated > (nr_active + nr_inactive) / 2.

P.S : Mel said "it should be merged and arguably is a stable candidate for 2.6.35"

Cc: Iram Shahzad <iram.shahzad@...fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Acked-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
---
 mm/compaction.c |    7 ++++---
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
index 94cce51..4d709ee 100644
--- a/mm/compaction.c
+++ b/mm/compaction.c
@@ -214,15 +214,16 @@ static void acct_isolated(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc)
 /* Similar to reclaim, but different enough that they don't share logic */
 static bool too_many_isolated(struct zone *zone)
 {
-
-	unsigned long inactive, isolated;
+	unsigned long active, inactive, isolated;
 
 	inactive = zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_FILE) +
 					zone_page_state(zone, NR_INACTIVE_ANON);
+	active = zone_page_state(zone, NR_ACTIVE_FILE) +
+					zone_page_state(zone, NR_ACTIVE_ANON);
 	isolated = zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_FILE) +
 					zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_ANON);
 
-	return isolated > inactive;
+	return isolated > (inactive + active) / 2;
 }
 
 /*
-- 
1.7.0.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ