[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <B2150E1E4418E1438554A300EA5040E40D46A5BB13@ITSVLEX06.it.maxim-ic.internal>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 16:30:14 -0700
From: Peter Hsiang <Peter.Hsiang@...im-ic.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Jesse Marroquin <Jesse.Marroquin@...im-ic.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ia.com>,
Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@...sung.com>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ASoC: Add max98088 CODEC driver
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 02:08:30PM -0700, Peter Hsiang wrote:
> > This patch adds the MAX98088 CODEC driver.
>
> The major issue with this is that the driver needs to be updated to
> current ASoC versions - you should always be working against the trees
> that are in linux-next for new drivers. For ASoC you should be looking
> at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound-2.6.git
Thanks for the git location you provided. What version of Linux
kernel does this git/broonie/sound-2.6.git version correspond to?
Is it newer than even the latest kernel-next?
Some of the ASoC API functions and features in the latest version of
the kernel you require us to use are not in the popular stable kernel
version 2.6.32 that people are using today to build products.
Our intent is to release driver code that will work in both the current
and latest kernel versions.
Would it not be a good idea to use the API functions that exist in
both the very latest and the currently popular kernel version?
Does kernel.org provide a channel for releasing codec drivers that
can be backward compatible to a popular earlier kernel version?
>
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Hsiang <peter.hsiang at maxim-ic.com>
>
> Please write your e-mail address properly - it'll end up in the git logs
> anyway. It'd also be nice to credit your sources when you've taken code
> from other drivers :)
>
> > +#define EQ_CFG_MAX 32
>
> > +/* Speaker excursion limiter filter response configurations */
> > +#define EX_CFG_MAX 32
>
> Multiple definitions of this.
These are not multiple definitions.
They are 2 different ones - the equalizer, and excursion limiter.
>
> > + /* Set receiver_mode to:
> > + * 0 = amplifier output, or
> > + * 1 = LINE level output
> > + */
> > + unsigned int receiver_mode;
>
> Better to use bools or bitfields.
>
> > + /* Bypass option for INA to MIC1 connection
> > + * 0 = normal setting
> > + * 1 = bypass enabled
> > + */
> > + unsigned int ina_to_mic1_bypass;
> > +
> > + /* Bypass option for MIC1 to MIC2 connection
>
> What are these - they sound like something I'd expect to be configurable
> at runtime?
>
> > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ config SND_SOC_ALL_CODECS
> > select SND_SOC_DA7210 if I2C
> > select SND_SOC_JZ4740 if SOC_JZ4740
> > select SND_SOC_MAX9877 if I2C
> > + select SND_SOC_MAX98088 if I2C
>
> The sorting should be lexical.
Ok, thanks
>
> > +/*
> > + * Read the MAX98088 I2C register space
> > + * Note: this driver source code is backward compatible to kernel
> > + * version 2.6.32.
> > + */
> > +static unsigned int max98088_read(struct snd_soc_codec *codec,
> > + unsigned int reg)
>
> Just use soc-cache. Compatibility code for older kernels isn't really
> acceptable for mainline due to the increased maintainance burden and it
> will at best result in a driver that doesn't work as well as possible.
This integrated registers feature is not available in 2.6.32
Is it ok with you to keep it this way for this release? Thanks.
>
> > + client = (struct i2c_client *)codec->control_data;
>
> No need to cast away from void.
Ok will do - but no harm in being informative :)
>
> > +/*
> > + * For kernels compiled without unsigned long long int division
> > + */
> > +unsigned long long int ulldiv(unsigned long long int dividend,
> > + unsigned long long int divisor)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long long int quotient = 0;
> > + int shift = 1;
> > +
> > + if (divisor == 0)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + /* result is 1.0 if divisor and dividend are equal */
> > + if (divisor == dividend)
> > + return 1;
> > +
> > + /* Normalize divisor */
> > + while (!(divisor & 0x8000000000000000ULL)) {
> > + divisor <<= 1;
> > + ++shift;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Shift and subtract */
> > + while (shift--) {
> > + quotient <<= 1;
> > +
> > + if (divisor <= dividend) {
> > + dividend -= divisor;
> > + ++quotient;
> > + }
> > + divisor >>= 1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Round up */
> > + if (dividend > divisor)
> > + ++quotient;
> > +
> > + return quotient;
> > +}
>
> > +/*
> > + * Load equalizer DSP coefficient configurations registers
> > + */
> > +void m98088_eq_band(struct snd_soc_codec *codec, unsigned int dai,
> > + unsigned int band, u16 *coefs)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int eq_reg;
> > + unsigned int i;
> > +
> > + if (band > 4)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + if (dai > 1)
> > + return;
>
> These look like they should be BUG_ON().
Yes, good idea.
>
> > +/*
> > + * Excursion limiter modes
> > + */
> > +static const char *max98088_ex_mode[] = {
> > + "Off",
> > + "100Hz",
> > + "400Hz",
> > + "600Hz",
> > + "800Hz",
> > + "1000Hz",
> > + "200-400Hz",
> > + "400-600Hz",
> > + "400-800Hz",
> > + "user-400Hz",
> > + "user-600Hz",
> > + "user-800Hz",
> > + "user-1000Hz"
>
> These user options look very suspicous.
The first 8 options are settings pre-defined in hardware that the
user can choose from.
The last 4 are user programmable options, and thus the name 'user'.
>
> > +static int max98088_ex_mode_set(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
> > + struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
> > +{
> > + struct snd_soc_codec *codec = snd_kcontrol_chip(kcontrol);
> > + struct max98088_priv *max98088 = codec->private_data;
> > + unsigned int *mode = &max98088->ex_mode;
> > +
> > + *mode = ucontrol->value.integer.value[0];
> > +
> > + if (*mode <= ARRAY_SIZE(ex_mode_table))
> > + max98088_write(codec, M98088_REG_41_SPKDHP,
> > + ex_mode_table[*mode]);
>
> Report the error if there's an invalid input.
Ok
>
> > +static const char *max98088_hp_spk_mute[] = {"disable", "enable"};
> > +static const struct soc_enum max98088_hp_spk_mute_enum[] = {
> > + SOC_ENUM_SINGLE_EXT(2, max98088_hp_spk_mute),
>
> Why are you doing this rather than just using a standard switch control?
> Even if there's a reason to not use one of the standard register
> controls this should be presented to the application layer as a switch
> rather than as an enumeration.
We will use a switch control. Thanks
>
> The same issue applies to the other outputs.
>
> > +static const char *max98088_dcblk[] = {"Off", "On"};
> > +static const struct soc_enum max98088_dcblk_enum[] = {
> > + SOC_ENUM_SINGLE(M98088_REG_20_DAI2_FILTERS, 0, 2,
> max98088_dcblk),
> > +};
>
> Again, present a switch to userspace.
Yes
>
> > + SOC_DOUBLE_R("Headphone volume", M98088_REG_39_LVL_HP_L,
> > + M98088_REG_3A_LVL_HP_R, 0, 31, 0),
>
> Volume, not volume.
>
> > + SOC_SINGLE("MIC1 gain", M98088_REG_35_LVL_MIC1, 0, 31, 1),
> > + SOC_SINGLE("MIC2 gain", M98088_REG_36_LVL_MIC2, 0, 31, 1),
>
> > + SOC_SINGLE("MIC1 pre", M98088_REG_35_LVL_MIC1, 5, 3, 0),
> > + SOC_SINGLE("MIC2 pre", M98088_REG_36_LVL_MIC2, 5, 3, 0),
> > +
> > + SOC_SINGLE("INA gain", M98088_REG_37_LVL_INA, 0, 7, 1),
> > + SOC_SINGLE("INB gain", M98088_REG_38_LVL_INB, 0, 7, 1),
>
> These should all be named " Volume", as should all your other " gain" or
> " pre" controls.
Ok
>
> > + SOC_SINGLE("EQ1 switch", M98088_REG_49_CFG_LEVEL, 0, 1, 0),
> > + SOC_SINGLE("EQ2 switch", M98088_REG_49_CFG_LEVEL, 1, 1, 0),
>
> Capitalise switch.
I noticed that by capitalizing the first letter of the 2nd word,
the 2nd word is dropped out by the system when amixer lists them.
"EQ1 Switch" becomes just "EQ1", while "EQ1 switch" is "EQ1 switch".
Have you seen this behavior before?
Is this a known issue with some version of amixer or ASoC code base?
>
> > +/* Left speaker mixer switch */
> > +static const struct snd_kcontrol_new
> max98088_left_speaker_mixer_controls[] = {
> > + SOC_DAPM_SINGLE("Left DAC1", M98088_REG_2B_MIX_SPK_LEFT, 7, 1,
> 0),
>
> All of these should be " Switch".
Ok
>
> > +static int max98088_hp_event(struct snd_soc_dapm_widget *w,
> > + struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol, int event)
> > +{
> > + struct snd_soc_codec *codec = w->codec;
> > + u16 status;
> > +
> > + BUG_ON(event != SND_SOC_DAPM_PRE_PMD);
> > +
> > + /* powering down headphone gracefully */
> > + status = max98088_read(codec, M98088_REG_4D_PWR_EN_OUT);
> > + if ((status & M98088_HPEN) == M98088_HPEN) {
> > + max98088_hw_write(codec, M98088_REG_4D_PWR_EN_OUT,
> > + (status & ~M98088_HPEN));
> > + }
> > + schedule_timeout_interruptible(msecs_to_jiffies(20));
>
> This should be non-interruptible since there's no handling of any actual
> interruptions.
Ok
>
> > +/* DAPM AUDIO_MAP: */
> > +static const struct snd_soc_dapm_route audio_map[] = {
> > + /* Left headphone output mixer */
> > + {"Left HP Mixer", "Left DAC1", "DACL1"},
> > + {"Left HP Mixer", "Left DAC2", "DACL2"},
> > + {"Left HP Mixer", "Right DAC1", "DACR1"},
> > + {"Left HP Mixer", "Right DAC2", "DACR2"},
> > + {"Left HP Mixer", "MIC1", "Mic Bias"},
> > + {"Left HP Mixer", "MIC2", "Mic Bias"},
>
> This looks wrong - I'd expect this to be switching the microphone input
> to the mixer, not the bias. Mixing the bias in would just present a DC
> level which isn't going to be great. Similarly for all your other
> microphone input switching.
I'll look at switching the microphone input like you suggested. Thanks.
No worries, when turning on the mic bias, the hardware will not
add DC into the digital samples. It's handled well.
>
> > + /* DAI clock master/slave wrt the codec */
> > + switch (fmt & SND_SOC_DAIFMT_CBS_CFS) {
>
> You should be using the masks for your switch statements. Using
> specific values is at best harder to read and at worst will lead to
> false positives. This applies to all your comparisons in this function.
This method was inherited from another released driver.
We will adopt the new method.
>
> > + /* BCI: normal bclk (rise) */
> > + /* WCI: invert frame */
> > + snd_soc_update_bits(codec,
> M98088_REG_14_DAI1_FORMAT,
> > + M98088_DAI_BCI, M98088_DAI_WCI);
> > + break;
> > + case SND_SOC_DAIFMT_IB_NF:
> > + /* BCI: invert bclk (fall) */
> > + /* WCI: normal frame */
> > + snd_soc_update_bits(codec,
> M98088_REG_14_DAI1_FORMAT,
> > + M98088_DAI_WCI, M98088_DAI_BCI);
>
> This code (and most of the other update_bits() usages round here) looks
> wrong - I'd expect to see a constant bitmask being supplied as the mask
> argument then the value changing to set different values.
The M98088_DAI_BCI and M98088_DAI_WCI are bit field masks.
Is this what you expect? If not, could you clarify? Thanks!
>
> > + max98088_write(codec, M98088_REG_16_DAI1_IOCFG,
> > + (1<<6) | /* SEL : map DAI1 to S1 */
> > + (0<<5) | /* LTEN : ADC->DAC loop-through enable
> */
> > + (0<<4) | /* LBEN : loopback (0=disable,
> 1=enable) */
> > + (0<<3) | /* DMONO : DAC SDIN (0=stereo, 1=mono)
> */
>
> These look like things that should be configured by the user, especially
> LTEN.
>
> > + (0<<2) | /* HIZOFF : ADC SDOUT (0=HiZ, 1=Drive)
> */
> > + (1<<1) | /* SDOEN : serial data out ENABLE */
> > + (1<<0)); /* SDIEN : serial data in ENABLE */
>
> These look like they ought to be DAPM widgets for the AIF.
Good idea. Which widget(s) will drive SDOEN, or SDIEN?
>
> > +static int max98088_dai_set_sysclk(struct snd_soc_dai *dai,
> > + int clk_id, unsigned int freq, int
> dir)
> > +{
> > + struct snd_soc_codec *codec = dai->codec;
> > + struct max98088_priv *max98088 = codec->private_data;
> > +
> > + if (freq != max98088->sysclk) {
>
> It would be clearer to just return in this case so you don't have so
> much indentation.
Good point. Thanks for this suggestion on the source indentation.
>
> > + /* If codec is currently running, toggle reset */
> > + if (max98088_read(codec, M98088_REG_51_PWR_SYS)
> > + & M98088_SHDNRUN) {
> > + snd_soc_update_bits(codec, M98088_REG_51_PWR_SYS,
> > + M98088_SHDNRUN, 0);
> > + snd_soc_update_bits(codec, M98088_REG_51_PWR_SYS,
> > + 0, M98088_SHDNRUN);
>
> Will this reset the whole chip?
It's not a chip reset.
I will correct the comments to make it clearer. Thanks.
>
> > +static inline int rate_index(int rate)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rate_table); i++) {
> > + if (rate_table[i].rate >= rate)
> > + return i;
> > + }
> > + return 0;
>
> This won't indicate if there's a failure to find a match.
You are right.
This will default to the hardware default setting of 0 if the sample
rate specified by the user were invalid.
I'll take a look this.
>
> > + /* data 16/24 bit width */
> > + switch (params_format(params)) {
> > + case SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_S16_LE:
> > + /* WS: 16bit */
> > + snd_soc_update_bits(codec, M98088_REG_14_DAI1_FORMAT,
> > + M98088_DAI_WS, 0);
> > + break;
> > + case SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_S24_LE:
> > + /* WS: 24bit */
> > + snd_soc_update_bits(codec, M98088_REG_14_DAI1_FORMAT,
> > + 0, M98088_DAI_WS);
> > + break;
> > + }
>
> Again, your snd_soc_update_bits() usage seems confused. You're also not
> checking for invalid inputs. There are other instances of this in the
> driver, I'll not comment them all.
It uses the bit field mask to control the desired bits.
>
> > + snd_soc_update_bits(codec, M98088_REG_51_PWR_SYS, M98088_SHDNRUN,
> 0);
> > +
> > + if (rate != cdata->rate) {
> > + /* set DAI1 SR1 value for the DSP; FREQ1:0=anyclock */
> > + reg11val = (rate_table[rate_index(rate)].sr1 << 4) | 0;
> > + max98088_write(codec, M98088_REG_11_DAI1_CLKMODE,
> reg11val);
> > + cdata->rate = rate;
>
> Just directly use snd_soc_update_bits() - it will suppress null changes.
Good idea.
>
> > + /* Configure NI when operating as master */
> > + if (max98088_read(codec, M98088_REG_14_DAI1_FORMAT)
> > + & M98088_DAI_MAS) {
> > + BUG_ON(max98088->sysclk == 0);
>
> BUG_ON() is unfriendly here - this is a machine driver configuration
> error and normally BUG_ON() would be an internal error in the driver.
> Better error reporting please.
Ok
>
> > +static int max98088_set_bias_level(struct snd_soc_codec *codec,
> > + enum snd_soc_bias_level level)
> > +{
> > + switch (level) {
> > + case SND_SOC_BIAS_ON:
> > + max98088_write(codec, M98088_REG_51_PWR_SYS,
> M98088_SHDNRUN);
> > + break;
> > +
> > + case SND_SOC_BIAS_PREPARE:
> > + max98088_write(codec, M98088_REG_51_PWR_SYS,
> M98088_SHDNRUN);
> > + break;
>
> Drop the _ON cacse if it's the same. Also, how will this interact with
> the management of SHDNRUN in hw_params()?
Ok
>
> > + case SND_SOC_BIAS_STANDBY:
> > + max98088_sync_cache(codec);
> > + max98088_write(codec, M98088_REG_51_PWR_SYS,
> > + M98088_SHDNRUN|M98088_PWRSV);
> > + break;
>
> Do you really want to sync the cache every time we drop into standby?
Good point.
>
> > + /* Configure digital mic / external mic */
> > + /* Digital mic needs REG_15 OSR1=1 */
> > + regval = ((0<<6) | /* digital mic clock freq = PCLK/8 */
> > + (0<<5) | /* DIGMICL enable */
> > + (0<<4) | /* DIGMICR enable */
> > + (0<<0)); /* external mic enable */
>
> These look like they ought to be managed via DAPM?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists