linux-kernel - Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH] vmscan: don't use return value trick when oom_killer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTi=DrT1QUTPoUOVBt-d+b-4N_JGDDzaxZqrujD7P@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 2 Sep 2010 12:18:27 +0900
From:	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	"M. Vefa Bicakci" <bicave@...eronline.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH] vmscan: don't use return value trick when oom_killer_disabled

On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 12:05 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
<kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> > I don't want to send risky patch to -stable.
>>
>> Still I don't want to use oom_killer_disabled magic.
>> But I don't want to prevent urgent stable patch due to my just nitpick.
>>
>> This is my last try(just quick patch, even I didn't tried compile test).
>
> Looks like conceptually correct. If you will test it and fix whitespace damage,
> I'll ack this one gladly.
>
> Thanks.
>

I will resend formal patch ASAP. Maybe tonight after out of office.
Thanks for quick reply.


-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/