linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.35-rc5 inconsistent lock state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 3 Sep 2010 09:37:55 +0200
From:	Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>
To:	unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc:	Martin Pirker <lkml.collector@...il.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Dan Carpenter <error27.lkml@...il.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	Richard Kennedy <richard@....demon.co.uk>, mjg@...hat.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.35-rc5 inconsistent lock state

On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 21:48:04 +0200
Martin Pirker <lkml.collector@...il.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
> > I posted a patch for this the other day, but I just now notice
> > that it was a private list of CC addresses.
> >
> > Can anyone try this completed untested patch?
> 
> [sorry Jens for my first failed test attempt, my idiocy...]
> 
> applied to 2.6.35-rc5 -> error message so far not seen again.
> about functionality, well, HD spin up control via laptop_mode I cannot
> say, I've a SSD...
> 
> HTH,
> Martin

Is this patch on route to mainline? Or did this get fixed some other
way?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/