[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C80FB05.1040706@atmel.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:41:25 +0200
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To: Paul Chavent <paul.chavent@...c.net>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, jkosina@...e.cz,
richard.cochran@...cron.at, jpirko@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm driver net macb
Le 02/09/2010 22:40, Paul Chavent :
> When listing processes on a system with SOFT/HARD_IRQ enabled, the name
> of the ethernet device is [irq/eth%d] (instead of [irq/eth0] for example).
>
> This patch call the request_irq function after having initialized the
> name of the device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Chavent <paul.chavent@...c.net>
[..]
> @@ -1214,13 +1281,23 @@
> err = register_netdev(dev);
> if (err) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Cannot register net device, aborting.\n");
> - goto err_out_free_irq;
> + goto err_out_iounmap;
> }
>
> if (macb_mii_init(bp) != 0) {
> goto err_out_unregister_netdev;
> }
>
> + dev->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> + err = request_irq(dev->irq, macb_interrupt, IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM,
> + dev->name, dev);
> + if (err) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR
> + "%s: Unable to request IRQ %d (error %d)\n",
> + dev->name, dev->irq, err);
> + goto err_out_unregister_netdev;
> + }
> +
The string is modified in register_netdev() so why don't you deal
with IRQ just after it? I would have placed the code snippet
before macb_mii_init(): what do you think about this?
Best regards,
--
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists